Name of Official Inviting RFP : | Sherab Lodhen | Designation : | Procurement Officer | ||||||||||||||
Official Address : |
|
Contact details : |
|
||||||||||||||
The procuring Agency reserves the right to accept or reject all Tenders / Pre-Qualifications / EOIs | |||||||||||||||||
Note: Financial Institute will update the payment transactions only at the end of the day, so the bidders should make sure the securities and other payments are made at least one day before the submission date. | |||||||||||||||||
Documents |
Amendment / Corrigendum No. : 2
|
|
Amendment / Corrigendum Text : | <p>Slight changes in the team compocsition & evaluation criteria. Please refer the "minimum requirement for the bidders" in the TOR attached with the corrigendum notice.</p> |
Field Name | Old Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Criteria, sub-criteria and the points system for the evaluation of Technical Proposals are: Points (i) Specific experience of the Consultant relevant to the assignment: [10]
(ii) Adequacy of the proposed methodology and work plan in responding to the Terms of Reference: a) Technical approach and methodology [20] b) Work plan [5]
Total points for criterion (ii): [25] (iii) Key professional staff qualifications and competence for the assignment: a) Team Leader/Project Manager: [10] b) System Designer [20] c) Nine System Developer (Front-end and Database) [30]
Total points for criterion (iii): [60] The number of points to be assigned to each of the above positions or disciplines shall be determined considering the following three sub-criteria and relevant percentage weights: 1) General qualifications [20%] 2) Adequacy for the assignment [65] 3) Experience in region and language [15] Total weight: 100%
(iv) Suitability of the transfer of knowledge (training) program: a) Training approach and methodology [5]
Total points for criterion (iv): [5]
(v) Participation by nationals among proposed key staff [0 ]
Total points for the five criteria: 100
The minimum technical score St required to pass is: 70 Points |
Criteria, sub-criteria and the points system for the evaluation of Technical Proposals are: Points (i) Specific experience of the Consultant relevant to the assignment: [10]
(ii) Adequacy of the proposed methodology and work plan in responding to the Terms of Reference: a) Technical approach and methodology [20] b) Work plan [5]
Total points for criterion (ii): [25] (iii) Key professional staff qualifications and competence for the assignment: a) Team Leader/Project Manager: [20] b) System Architech [10] C) Business analyst [15] d) System Developer (Front-end and Database) [15]
Total points for criterion (iii): [60] The number of points to be assigned to each of the above positions or disciplines shall be determined considering the following three sub-criteria and relevant percentage weights: 1) General qualifications [20%] 2) Adequacy for the assignment [65] 3) Experience in region and language [15] Total weight: 100%
(iv) Suitability of the transfer of knowledge (training) program: a) Training approach and methodology [5]
Total points for criterion (iv): [5]
(v) Participation by nationals among proposed key staff [0 ]
Total points for the five criteria: 100
The minimum technical score St required to pass is: 70 Points |
Amendment / Corrigendum No. : 1
|
|
Amendment / Corrigendum Text : | <p>Slight changes in the team compocsition & evaluation criteria. Please refer the "minimum requirement for the bidders" in the TOR attached with the corrigendum notice.</p> |
Field Name | Old Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Closing Date & Time | 28/07/2021 09:59 | 01/08/2021 09:59 |
Opening Date & Time | 28/07/2021 10:59 | 01/08/2021 10:59 |
Amendment / Corrigendum/ Addendum No. : | 1 | ||||
Sl. No. | File Name | File Description | File Size (in KB) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | corrigendum IBLS Project team.docx | Changes in the Team composition. | 15208 |